McGill University
Faculty of Law
Chancellor Day Hall
3644 Peel Street, Room 44
Montréal (Qc.) H3A 1W9
Phone : (514) 398-6624
Manikis, M., & Watson, G. (2023). Sentencing, Public Opinion, and Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Julian V Roberts. Oxford University Press. |
Manikis, M. (2023). Sentencing Indigenous Offenders. In Manson, A. S., Healy, P., Trotter, G., Roberts, J. V., Ives, D. E., & Iftene, A. (eds.), Sentencing and Penal Policy in Canada: Cases, Materials and Commentary (4th edition). Emond. |
Manikis, M. (2023). Victim-related Assumptions Underlying Plea-based Sentence Reductions: A Communicative and Experiential Framework. In Roberts, J. V. & Ryberg, J. (eds.), Sentencing the Self-Convicted: The Ethics of Pleading Guilty. HART. |
Manikis, M. (2021). Criminal Justice and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In Roberts, J. V. & Grossman, M. (eds.), Criminal Justice in Canada : A Reader, (6th edition). Thomson. |
Manikis, M. (2020), Role of the Victim at Sentencing. In Cole, D. & Roberts, J. V. (eds.), Sentencing in Canada: Law, Policy and Practice. Irwin Law. |
Manikis, M. (2020) Comparative Perspectives on Victim Participation in Justice Proceedings. In Erez, E. & Ibarra, P. (eds), The Oxford Encyclopedia of International Criminology. Oxford University Press. |
Manikis, M. (2020). Criminal Justice and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In Roberts, J. V. & Grossman, M. (eds.), Criminal Justice in Canada : A Reader, 6th ed. Thomson. |
Manikis, M. (2019). Conceptualizing the victim within criminal justice processes in common law tradition. In Brown, D. K., Turner, J. I. & Weisser, B. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process. Oxford University Press. |
Manikis, M. (2017). The Difficult Road to Accountability: A Study on Complaints Mechanisms to Investigate and Address Victims' Rights Violations. In Desrosiers, J., Garcia, M., & Sylvestre, M-E. (eds.), Réformer le droit criminel au Canada : défis et possibilités / Criminal Law Reform in Canada: Challenges and Possibilities. Yvon Blais. |
Manikis, M. (2015). Criminal Justice and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In Roberts, J. V. & Grossman, M. (eds), Criminal Justice in Canada : A Reader, 5th ed. Thomson. |
Manikis, M. (2011). Criminal Justice and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In Roberts, J. V. & Grossman, M. (eds), Criminal Justice in Canada: A Reader, 4th ed. Thomson. |
Manikis, M., & Matheson, A. (2023). Communicating Censure: The Relevance of Conditions of Imprisonment at Sentencing and During the Administration of the Sentence. The Modern Law Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12845 |
Manikis, M., & Doiron, N. (2023). Solitary confinement as state harm: Reimagining sentencing in light of dynamic censure and state blame. Punishment & Society, 26(1), 72-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745231184077 |
Manikis, M. (2022). Recognising state blame in sentencing: A communicative and relational framework. The Cambridge Law Journal, 81(2), 294-322. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197322000198 |
Manikis, M. (2021). Conceptualising the Victim in England and Wales and the United States within a Spectrum of Public and Private Interests. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 41(1), 219-242. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa032 |
Manikis, M., & De Santi, J. (2020). Punishment and Retribution Within the Bail Process: An Analysis of the Public Confidence in the Administration of Justice Ground for Pre-Trial Detention. Canadian Journal of Law and Society/La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société, 35(3), 413-435. https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2020.12 |
Pascoe, D., & Manikis, M. (2020). Making sense of the victim’s role in clemency decision making. International Review of Victimology, 26(1), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758018805567 |
Manikis, M., & De Santi, J. (2019). Punishing while presuming innocence: A study on bail conditions and administration of justice offences. Les Cahiers de droit, 60(3), 873-904. https://doi.org/10.7202/1064656ar |
Manikis, M. (2019). A new model of the criminal justice process: Victims’ rights as advancing penal parsimony and moderation. Criminal Law Forum, 30, 201-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-018-09362-6 |
Manikis, M. (2019). Contrasting the emergence of the victims’ movements in the United States and England and Wales. Societies, 9(2), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc9020035 |
Manikis, M., & Grbac, P. (2017). Bargaining for justice: the road towards prosecutorial accountability in the plea bargaining process. Man. LJ, 40, 85. |
Manikis, M. (2017), Expanding Participation: Victims as Agents of Accountability in the Criminal Justice Process. Public Law, 63-80. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2997559 |
Manikis, M. (2016), Towards Accountability and Fairness for Aboriginal People: The Recognition of Gladue as a Principle of Fundamental Justice That Applies to Prosecutors. Canadian Criminal Law Review, 21, 173, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3045409 |
Manikis, M. (2015), The Recognition of Prosecutorial Obligations in an Era of Mandatory Minimum Sentences of Imprisonment and Over-Representation of Aboriginal People in Prisons. Supreme Court Law Review, 31, 277-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2869380 |
Manikis, M. (2015). Victim impact statements at sentencing: Towards a clearer understanding of their aims. University of Toronto Law Journal, 65(2), 85-123. https://doi.org/10.3138/UTLJ.2717 |
Manikis, M. (2015). Imagining the Future of Victims’ Rights: A Comparative Perspective, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 13(1), 163. |
Roberts, J. V., & Manikis, M. (2013). Victim personal statements in England and Wales: Latest (and last) trends from the Witness and Victim Experience Survey. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 13(3), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895812452281 |
Manikis, M. (2011). Recognizing victims' role and rights during plea bargaining: A fair deal for victims of crime. Crim. LQ, 58, 411. |
Manikis, M. (2012). Navigating through an obstacle course: The complaints mechanism for victims of crime in England and Wales. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 12(2), 149-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895811424765 |
Manikis, M., & Roberts, J. V., (2011). Recognizing Ancillary Harm at Sentencing: A Proportionate and Balanced Response. Canadian Criminal Law Review, 15(2), 131-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2869308 |
Manikis, M. & Roberts, J. V. (2010). Victim Impact Statements at Sentencing: The Relevance of Ancillary Harm, Canadian Criminal Law Review, 15(1), 1-25. |
Manikis, M. (2005). Les tribunaux d'arbitrage civils islamiques en Ontario. International Legal Perspectives, 1(1). |
Manikis, M. (2022, may). Impact statements at sentencing: Developments since the victims bill of rights. Gouvernement du Canada. |
Wemmers, J-A, Manikis, M. & Sitoianu, D. (2017, june). Le dédommagement dans le contexte de la justice pénale. Victim Justice Network, CICC. Read the report (ENG) Read the report (FR) |
Manikis, M. (2016, december). Report on Judicial Delays in Criminal Proceedings. Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs. |
Manikis, M. (2014, february). Analysis and Interpretation of the Canadian Victims’ Bill of Rights (Bill C-32). Office of the Federal Ombudsman for Victims of Crime, Department of Justice Canada. |
Manikis, M. & Roberts, J. V. (2012). Victims' Needs and the Development of Outcome Measurements. Ministry of Justice of England and Wales. |
Manikis, M. & Roberts, J. V. (2012).Victim Impact Statements in Canada: Recent Guidance from the Courts of Appeal. Victims of Crime Research Digest. |
Manikis, M., & Roberts, J. V. (2011). Victim Personal Statements at Sentencing: A Review of the Empirical Research. Office of the Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses of England and Wales. |
Manikis, M. (2011). Research findings and legislation on victims' rights in Canada. Senate of Canada. |
Attention - Votre version d'Internet Explorer est vieille de 19 ans et peut ne pas vous offrir une expérience optimale sur le site du CICC. Veuillez mettre à jour votre ordinateur pour une expérience optimale. Nous vous recommandons Firefox ou Chrome, ou encore ChromeFrame si vous êtes dans un environnement corporatif ou académique dans lequel vous ne pouvez pas mettre à jour Internet Explorer.